The NY Times Advice to Obama RE: Keystone XL

“[President Obama] should say no, and for one overriding reason: A president who has repeatedly identified climate change as one of humanity’s most pressing dangers cannot in good conscience approve a project that—even by the State Department’s most cautious calculations—can only add to the problem.”
NY TImes Editorial, March 11, 2013

Only days after the NY Times ditched its green blog, it has made a very bold statement in an editorial recommending that President Obama nix the Keystone XL pipeline.

Editorials in daily newspapers are generally a dime a dozen. Editors have their own opinions just like anyone else, and they typically use their editorials as a venue to reveal their perspectives.

But the NY Times isn’t your garden-variety daily newspaper. Established in 1851, it has been a continuous daily newspaper ever since, winning 108 Pulitzer Prizes. It’s the largest metropolitan newspaper in the US, and the third largest newspaper overall after the Wall Street Journal and USA Today. Its website is the most popular newspaper website with over 30 million unique visitors every month.

So it’s reasonable to assume that a newspaper of this calibre might have some clout. The editorial encourages the President to consider the long-term consequences of approving the Keystone XL pipeline. Continue reading

Obama’s “State of the Union” and How We Will Tackle Climate Change

“…if Congress won’t act soon to protect future generations, I will.”
—President Barack Obama during this week’s State of the Union address

President Obama’s State of the Union address took place this week. In it he addressed energy and specifically the importance of making changes to combat climate change more than any previous Commander in Chief in any State of the Union address. I thought about posting some quotes but rather than take anythign out of context, I’ve reproduced everything he had to say on the matter in its entirety. I’ve highlighted in bold particularly key points that stood out to me, and I’ve included some of my own comments at the very end. I truly hope this is the beginning of the end of ignoring the threats to our planet from greenhouse gas emissions.

Continue reading

Warmest Year for the US since 1895

Every January the President of the United States provides a Sate of the Union address, as mandated by the Constitution (Article 2, Section 3, although the actual document only states that it must be done “from time to time.”)

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) updates us better than that when it comes to climate. They provide a State of the Climate report every month. It provides a lot of telling information, much of which is concerning to those who believe our human activities are playing a part in global warming.

For example, last month was the third warmest April recorded, about 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit above average. This came after the warmest March ever documented since accurate records have been kept, dating back to 1895. In March 2012, 15,000 temperature records across the US were broken. In fact, the first four months of this year were 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit above the 20th century average. All told, the last 12 months made for the warmest year the US has ever recorded, about 2.8 degrees Fahrenheit above the 20th century average.

And just wait because the record probably won’t last long; it’s highly possible that it will be broken at the end of this month. The twelve months from June 2011 to May 2012 will likely be hotter than May 2011 to April 2012 because May 2011 was cooler than average, bringing down the year’s average a little bit. So even if we have normal rather than above-average temperatures this month, a new record is likely. As Jake Crouch, lead researcher of the NOAA and author of the State of the Climate report stated in an interview with MSNBC, “Depending on how May 2012 turns out, the June 2011-May 2012 period will likely surpass the 12-month record that we just broke.”

Of course, the problem isn’t just warmer temperatures. Climate is much more than that. One obvious problem is the change in precipitation that results from climate change. Some areas get more precipitation leading to possible floods, and others get less causing droughts. As of May 1st, 38.2 percent of the contiguous US was experiencing drought conditions, up 6.3 percent compared with the same time last year.

The NOAA is careful to avoid making conclusions about the cause of these observations. It doesn’t claim these findings are all due to manmade contributions, since there are many factors that play a part in climate change. Of course, of the many variables that contribute to global warming, the one that’s been consistently climbing is the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, currently at 392 parts per million (ppm) and continuing to rise at about 2 ppm per year. Since there don’t seem to be any simple explanations for that observation other than the fact that our species adds 30 billion tons of the stuff to the atmosphere every year, I’m happy to say what the NOAA won’t: this is our fault folks, and we’d better get used to it because this is the new normal.